By Doug Newman
September 6, 2008
Posted at Freedom4um, Rhea
County News, Novakeo, The
Price of Liberty, Christian
The Libertarian Enterprise, Stumble Inn, Covenant News, Rational Review and Lew Rockwell's Blog.
I commend Bristol Palin on deciding to go through with her pregnancy and her plans to marry Levi Johnston. I also commend Sarah Palin for not rushing her daughter off to an abortionist because a pregnant, unwed 17-year-old daughter might tarnish her political image.
That said, Sarah Palin needs to step aside and let someone else be John McCain’s vice presidential nominee.
In a constitutional world, vice presidents would have a simple job with just two duties: break ties in the Senate and hope and pray that the president doesn’t meet an untimely demise.
We do not live in such a world. The vice presidency, like every other aspect of the federal government, has grown grotesquely out of control. Indeed, you can safely say that George HW Bush ran the show for Reagan and Dick Cheney has done likewise for Dubya.
By accepting John McCain’s offer, Sarah Palin stepped out of the relative serenity of Juneau -- 31,000 people and two McDonald's -- and into a political shark tank that will only become infinitely more unforgiving in the coming months and years.
Is it “unfair” that Palin’s personal life is being so heavily scrutinized? Was it "unfair" when so many people made so much of Bill Clinton's personal life? (And why do we hear next to nothing about John McCain’s sordid, philandering past?) Every politician ought to have their life pried apart in such a fashion. Especially in today’s world when you consider how intrusively they micromanage our lives. Have you filled out one of their 1040s recently?
No human being ought to be entrusted with as much power as we allow our presidents and VPs. When you pull back the curtain and you meet these Great and Powerful Ozzes, you find bumbling incompetent dolts. They are no better or smarter than you or I. Why are we so desperate to elevate these people to such levels of power and glory?
I have heard people ask what would happen had Bristol Palin been a black girl in the ghetto. She no doubt would not have the financial cushion she will very likely have access to. She would be been written off by all the Republican media jabberers as a product of 75 years of liberalism. But no-o-o-o-o. Her mom has just been tapped to run as VP representing the GOP, which many think stands for God’s Official Party. So just sit down and shut up if you have any questions about anyone's personal life.
It is bad enough that family breakdown has produced such tragic results in the inner city. How many prison inmates and gang bangers came from a stable family environment with both Mom and Dad having a solid influence in their lives?
While suburban kids might not face the same financial challenges as their ghetto counterparts, I have seen too many bad things happen when parents overemphasize careers at the expense of their children. Time and again, I have seen kids from affluent suburban backgrounds in places like the Jersey Shore, north suburban Phoenix and south suburban Denver go off the deep end. In every case, there was a dearth of parental involvement at home.
Yes, plenty of kids of dysfunctional homes have turned out just fine. But when a kid's life spins out of control, they almost always have had more than a few issues at home.
The fallout for these kids manifests itself in numerous ways, with teen pregnancy being just one of them. What did Sarah Palin sacrifice to advance her political career? I am not judging or condemning. I am just asking.
A hundred years ago, it was perfectly legal for a 10-year-old to walk into a drug store, plop down cash and buy heroin. And we had no drug problem! Why? Because parents and churches had a far stronger influence instilling morals and responsibility in children.
Today, the divorce rate is well over 50 percent, too many parents run off in every direction imaginable at the expense of their children, and way too many preachers think and talk like politicians whining, weeping and wailing about how the government doesn’t do enough to solve problems. America’s moral collapse has less to do with a "failure of government" than a failure of way too many people to heed the words of a bumper sticker one sees from time to time along Colorado’s Front Range: “Focus on your own damn family.” (More on the Focus thing in a few paragraphs.)
I have never raised kids, so anything I say on the subject is just an opinion and worth no more than you are paying me for it. However, I am going to pretend for a minute that I write an advice column.
“I have been a successful professional woman for the last 15 years. I earn $175,000 annually. Recently, I received an offer from a competitor that would more than double my income, but would also require almost constant travel. I have a four-month-old daughter with Downs Syndrome and a 17-year-old daughter who is four months pregnant. What should I do?”
-- Tempted in Scarsdale
“Family comes first. No one can adequately substitute for your influence and presence around the home. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Children spell love T-I-M-E. (1) You should reject this financially tantalizing offer and tend to your most important duties, i.e. those of a mother.”
As VP, Sarah Palin would be one heartbeat away from the presidency. Should something happen to a President McCain early on in his administration, can you imagine this scenario that I heard on the radio the other day?
“Madame President! You have a call on the red phone from Russia!”
“Could you please take a message? I am changing a diaper.”
You only have 24 hours in a day. Something has to give. Sarah Palin has children that desparately need her presence right now. The Palin family cannot afford this. (2)
I am just asking questions about a vice presidential nominee that are asked all the time about families out here in real life. America doesn’t suffer from a “lack of leadership in Washington” – barf -- nearly as much as it does from family breakdown. No president or “policy” can reverse this. Politics is merely a great big game of “let’s pretend”. The “family values” agenda is no exception.
Enter James Dobson of Focus on the Family. I used to have a lot of respect for Dobson back when his main focus, if you will, was on families, marriage, child rearing and Christian morals and values. Occasionally, he gave you a political opinion. That was his prerogative.
Then, he joined Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and the rest of the Religious Right and yoked himself unequally with some of the most un-Christlike people you can imagine. Millions of Christians followed him by drinking this Kool-Aid.
Earlier this year, Dobson said there was no way he could support John McCain for president. Then, he warmed up to the idea. Now, with the Palin nomination, Dobson and Focus have jumped right on board. Tom Minnery, a senior Focus official cited “’the pro-life, pro-family platform adopted by the party,’ and the selection of Palin.”
If she becomes VP, Sarah Palin is going to have to make some serious sacrifices in the family department. She stands to be gone from them almost continuously for up to eight years. Her "values" will have to be put on hold.
Don’t dare think that Sarah Palin is Ron Paul Lite. Establishment Republicans went out of their way to deny Ron Paul's very existence. There is no way they would pick anyone of his ilk to be VP.
Dobson has become just one more sorry religious hustler. While, he may not have a fleet of Lamborghinis or a private jet, he has used his Christian influence for a most un-Christian purpose: seducing millions of Christians into endorsing evil in high places. To hear some people talk here in Colorado, Dobson's words have the weight of Holy Writ.
I got an e-mail recently from someone who thought that Dobson actually supported McCain the whole time and that he just wanted to be schmoozed. I can get with that. Dobson positively basks in his newfound role of Christian political crusader.
Sarah Palin needs to step aside. In the eyes of God, her duties as a mother are far more important than her political career. In so doing, she would be a far greater role model -- and a far greater antithesis to Hillary Clinton -- than she could ever be as VP. Edward VIII abdicated the British throne “for the woman he loved.” Why can’t Sarah Palin do likewise for the sake of her family?
One of our earliest lurches away from true constitutionalism was the Twelfth Amendment. Until then, the VP was not the president’s running mate, but the person who got the second most votes in the Electoral College. If they had radically differing philosophies, oh well. This served as a brake on executive power.
Now, the VP’s role is to do the will of the president. Whatever independent, libertarian or constitutionalist principles Sarah Palin may have held must now be subordinated to the will of John McCain. In the words of Lew Rockwell:
"When a decent person accepts a job such as vice president, our first instinct is to celebrate that good people are in a position of power and influence. This is what the McCain campaign is counting on. But this is an illusion. The influence runs completely the other way. Good people become part of the party machine and surrender all their principles in order to survive.
“We are speaking here of the leviathan state that lives on a lie. To be part of that, you too must become part of the lie. It is perhaps possible to be the governor of a small state such as Alaska and not be part of the machine. It is not possible to be vice president of the United States and not enter into the deeply immoral arena that values the burying of all principle, and saying and doing whatever is necessary to bolster power.”
Sarah Palin is walking into the gears of a machine that will grind her into pieces for its own ends. It will require enormous courage for her to walk away with her soul intact. Yet this is what she needs to do and do now if she truly is the genuine article.
(1) While these last two sentences are not my original ideas, I sure wish they were.
(2) I have been slammed with e-mail on this piece. Some unlikely people have called it sexist. To them I say: I would have been far harsher on any man who left his family at such a time to pursue political glory.
While I was writing this piece,
I received this. He makes an excellent point.
This issue about Palin’s pregnant daughter is the most unimportant story I’ve read about all year. Right now, American naval, air and limited ground forces are preparing to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. The only problem with that is we have an enormous investment of naval military hardware cornered in the Gulf that could be annihilated by a massive anti-ship missile attack, or effectively neutralized by a multiple Neutron Bomb EMP blast overhead, thus compromising our military capability to defend the shores of America itself if attacked in retaliation. We have the most un-gifted military wannabe in American history holding the office of the President of the United States, and who might very well start World War III, and we’re worried about Palin’s pregnant daughter? -- CW in Oregon
When it was announced that Sarah would be VP under McPain, I was impressed by her and thought brilliant move to suck in all the Hillary suporters, what the heck, it's one party anyway (Ron Paul on TV the other night). Then I tuned in to see the 11:00 news the other night and she was still speaking. What Lew Rockwell had said and you just did was correct, she has sold her soul to support McPain and America's imperialist agenda. In my opinion now she's just more political scum. I was voting for Ron Paul, he's not running, so I'm voting for Chuck Baldwin because today I'll not vote the lesser of 2 evils which is still evil, but the man I want to be the president. I have been to Chucks church and met him. We need to rescue the Constitution from the museum it's in and put it back as the law of this nation, under God. -- GE in Florida
Let me tell you of an experience I had with a young black couple who were in one of my classes.
Shakeia was dating Matthew from the beginning of last school year. Matthew was a calm, handsome young man and Sakeia was excitable and somewhat petulant. Shakeia's home was not the best and Matthew told me that her step father was mentally abusive. Over the year we had many talks and the two became as my own children.
Matthew, however, saw that Shakeia's baggage and her temprament was more than he could handle and we spoke of how he should break off the relationship. I knew that he needed to, but I also knew that I would have to be there for Shakeia when it happened.
Sure enough Shakeia came into my room one day sobbing. I asked what had happened and she told me of Matthew's decision. I honestly did not expect the deep emotions of her response and I began to worry that she was pregnant. I asked her, "Shakeia, are you pregnant?" At once, she stopped her sobbing, straightened her back, looked me right in the eye, and said, "Mr. S., we've been around you too much for you to ask THAT question."
I view Sarah Palin through that filter -- her and her husband. The pro-family movement yearns for people with integrity to set the model -- not media personalities or political celebrities to give lip service to what they decide are our "issues". The country is falling apart and the only thing that can restore it is families that serve the family needs. Families are more important that presidents, corporations, profits or power. Furthermore, families will form around devotion, patience and love.
This country doesn't have any of those qualities. -- RS in Florida
If an unknown Palin had written to someone like James Dobson for advice, what do you think he would say if she wrote something like this:
"I have been a successful professional woman for the last 15 years. I earn $175,000 annually. Recently, I received an offer from a competitor that would more than double my income, but would also require almost constant travel. I have a four-month-old daughter with Downs Syndrome and a 17-year-old daughter who is four months pregnant. What should I do?”
There is no doubt that Dobson and Christian conservatives (and I am one of them) would say that motherhood is a higher calling than the offer from the competitor. The difference between me and the Christian conservatives who are in love with Palin (she soothes their consciences which have been destroyed by their support for McCain) is that I would recommend that Palin take motherhood over being the assistant warmonger in chief. They would make an exception. -- LV in Florida
BN in California sent me this link: http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_declassified_landing.htmI agree with your assessment of James Dobson. I am ashamed to think that I used to think he was more worth listening to than my own dear husband!!! After 41 years of marriage, I now know my husband has more character in his pinkie than all the evangelical leaders have combined. We are voting for Chuck Baldwin.-- N in Iowa
RY in Texas sent me this link: http://enlightened-rogue.blogspot.com/2008/09/meet-sarah-new-war-wench.htmlI wonder if Palin's daughter plans to marry the young man before the baby arrives (as they ought to), or afterwards as so many young people do whose priorities are off-kilter. The answer to that question would speak much to the character of the entire family.
I am like you, Palin is not enough to want to make me vote for McCain. As you have astutely pointed out, it will be Palin who modifies her principles as part of McCain's machine, rather than her influencing McCain.
And, yes, the Christian Right is useless. I would recommend taking a brief look at the literature of the Christian Right at its beginnings, roughly the late 70s. In particular, Jerry Falwell's "Listen, America" (1980). In it, the late Dr. Falwell reads like a fiery mixture of Rushdoony and Lew Rockwell. Compare it to the limpwristed James Dobson or even Falwell himself in his later years.
Thus it is accurate that which is in your article: The so-called "Christian Right" did not succeed in changing The Empire, rather The Empire was quite good at seducing the Christian Right -- who has no one but itself to blame. -- MS in Metro Denver
John Lofton of The American View sent me this 46-minute audio link. YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS: http://www.iotconline.com/radio/aview/show%20172.mp3
As a wife and mother who stayed at home and homeschooled 3 kids, I have been getting really ticked over all the "Superwoman" hype surrounding Gov. Palin.
For how many decades have conservatives and Christians been promoting the idea that stay-at-home moms have the most important job in the world? Yet the women they celebrate are the women who go out and do something else. As usual, their actions belie their words. It always amuses me to see how many spokeswomen for family values make a lucrative career out of traveling all over the country speaking at Christian and homeschool conferences telling other women how to be better wives, moms, and homemakers. How would they know, since they are never at home themselves?
I watched part of Greta Van Susteren's love-fest concerning Mrs. Palin, and one of her featured guests was Geraldine Ferraro. One of the things Ms. Ferraro said was she wondered why anyone would expect Mrs. Palin to be at home. What was there for her at home? She is talented, educated, etc. etc. The obvious implication was that only a village idiot would consider staying at home to raise a family. I almost kicked in the TV! But the sad part is, that for all their words to the contrary, conservatives and Christians have now embraced this philosophy. Women not only can do it all, but they must to be considered relevant.
I have several questions for the people who think that every woman ought to pursue a full-time career outside the home. If all mothers are doing this, then who takes care of the kids? Will men put less time into their careers? How is all this work vs home duty split up? Whose career takes precedence? If everyone has to hire paid sitters, where do all these workers come from? Since we have already declared that skilled, educated, talented, and intelligent people are far too important to take care of children, then what sort of people are going to work as child care workers? The job certainly won't pay much. Will the people who do such "menial" work be the kind of people one would want caring for their children?
Finally, how ironic it all is. If the West continues to fall off a cliff demographically, then Islam will come to dominate us without having to fight a war at all. We will have destroyed ourselves. It won't be the first time God has withdrawn His protective hand from a sinful, rebellious people.
Thanks for writing such wonderful columns. May the Lord bless you and the work that you do. -- PL
If you would like to post this, please e-mail me and include this URL.
Freely Speaking: Essays by Doug Newman